if you’re successful, you had help

What with the ongoing economic downturn, rising economic equality in America and the continuing Occupy Wall Street protests, it should come as no surprise that lots of people in this country are angry at our country’s wealthiest – the “1 percent.”

I, too, could be angry at those who grew up in families that had more money than mine. But it wouldn’t be fair to be upset at someone for having a bigger bank account and access to the trappings of a nicer lifestyle.

What does anger me is when some who are fortunate enough to be counted among the wealthy or upper-middle class believe they are more deserving of a good life than those who have fewer resources.

That’s the mindset I saw as I read this article revealing the unvarnished thoughts of five anonymous Philadelphia-area 1-percenters. I saw, albeit to different degrees, utter contempt for those lower than they on the socioeconomic ladder. They all stressed how hard they worked to get where they are. But they didn’t seem to recognize that much of their good fortune came through luck.

In the words of one business mogul who pegs his annual earnings at $2.5 million:

I feel that anybody can have wealth if they want to. It’s all about getting an education, filling a need in the marketplace. Anybody can have money.

He’s right, to a point. One oft-cited report estimates that by 2018, 63 percent of jobs in America will require some form of post-secondary education. The jobs one can get with additional education generally pay more than those that require just a high school diploma. Getting an education takes hard work.

But no one gets rich – or even secures a place in the middle class – without help.

Let’s return to those who discussed life in the 1 percent. One was born to parents who tapped her to work in the lucrative family business after college. She’s now worth $11 million. Another grew up in a large, working-class family and married a man now worth $20 million.

Even among those who weren’t born into or marry into money, no one is entirely self-made. That point is brilliantly made in this piece (beware the salty language) about how clueless some of the rich can be.

So … you were never a child? From birth, you were hunting and gathering your own food? You never had a mother to “hand” you milk?

You’re completely self-educated? At age 4, you sought out your own knowledge, and paid teachers out of your own pocket?

I don’t think you did. I’d have seen something about it on the news.

I pride myself on having risen into the middle class through education and hard work. And I could argue that my success is self-made.

I worked all the way through college, sometimes at two jobs! My internships didn’t come through family connections – I sent out resumes and writing samples to newspaper editors who recognized my talent even though they had no idea who I was! Instead of moving back in with my parents after college, I rented a room in a smelly apartment and made copies at Staples for $8 an hour until I landed a job in my field! (Mercifully it only took a month.)

I could argue that I got where I am on my own. But the truth is, I got a lot of help.

I gleaned a lot of information about the college-application process out of a book I received from my car insurance agent. I had a professor who tore apart my resume and redesigned it into a format that’s so good I’m still using it. My college expenses were partially covered by an on-campus work-study job, Pell Grants and subsidized student loans paid for through taxpayer money. I received scholarships funded by donors I’ve never met. You get the idea.

Now I volunteer with an organization that helps put disadvantaged teens on the road to college. I see it as simply paying forward the help I received.

Many of the poor and working-class simply aren’t aware of how to reach their goals. They need guidance from people who have this knowledge. If the fortunate ones among us share what we know, then more will have the chance to reach their full potential.

study what you love, but you’ll need a job

The implicit message I received as a high school student was to pick a college major I was interested in. It didn’t matter what a student majored in; a bachelor’s degree would open the door to a fulfilling, well-paying job.

That message made sense in the late 1990s, when the economy was humming.

Throughout college, my peers and I were still largely told to simply follow our passions. In one of the classes I took for my minor in sociology, the professor told us most students don’t get jobs in their majors anyway.

I was a journalism major, a course of study I chose because I wanted to work in journalism. I really hoped my sociology professor was wrong.

I graduated from college in 2004. Now my peers and those a few years younger are seeing the folly in believing that students can major in whatever interests them and have an easy time finding a good job after college. In excruciating, depressing detail, my local newspaper, The Philadelphia Inquirer, has devoted a series of front-page Sunday reports to the struggles twentysomethings are facing in an economy worse than America has seen since before we were born.

Their stories are heartbreaking in their familiarity. Take the 24-year-old University of Pennsylvania history graduate whose annual earnings total $12,000:

“The good schools project this image that if you have our degree, it’s a ticket to any job you want — which is obviously total B.S.,” he says. “I don’t think I was properly informed of the negative side to all this.”

The Great Recession seems to have prompted a healthy shift in how students are told to decide which path to pursue in college. Now they’re told to be more pragmatic than we were. There is an increased emphasis on STEM (for the uninitiated that stands for science, technology, engineering and math). This makes sense because our country is lacking professionals who excel in those disciplines. Surely, many students who haven’t thought about working in those areas would enjoy technical vocations. I have several friends who are engineers, pharmaceutical researchers and medical workers on various levels. They might not be able to walk right into a job, but they have a much easier time finding work than I. Their paychecks aren’t bad, either.

But not everyone can be a scientist. Some, like me, just aren’t cut out for it. Besides, if everyone majors in nursing or engineering because it’s practical, where will our future English teachers and photographers come from?

The struggles my generation faces illustrate the importance of every student having a different mindset than what we were told a decade ago: Pick a major that reflects your interests and passions. But keep in mind that you’ll need a job to go with that diploma.

That’s why one of my favorite series of writing assignments comes from a client that publishes magazines for high school students. A few times a year this client assigns me to find examples of what college graduates with certain majors have done with their degrees.

I’ve interviewed professionals with degrees in “practical” fields like math and engineering. But I’ve also spotlighted “fluffy” degrees including political science, religious studies and the arts. Many of the people I’ve interviewed have told me they are using their degrees for jobs they didn’t know existed. And a lot of them have changed their minds once or twice about what they wanted to do. But the important thing is that they explored potential careers and how their majors would help them on paths toward those careers. Every young person should do that.

Students who are in high school, and even the early years of college, don’t need to have a specific career in mind right away. But we can’t tell them to follow their passions and expect good jobs to materialize. As legions of twentysomethings will tell you, that simply doesn’t work.